sed -i '' -E -e 's/Copyright (\(c\) )?([0-9-]+),? (Google|The Chromium Authors).*(\r)?$/Copyright \2 Google LLC\4/' -e '/^((\/\/|#| \*) )?All rights reserved\.?\r?$/d' -e 's/name of Google Inc\. nor the/name of Google LLC nor the/' -e 's/POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE$/POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE./' $(git grep -El 'Copyright (\(c\) )?([0-9-]+),? (Google|The Chromium Authors).*$')
Plus manual fixes for src/processor/disassembler_x86.{cc,h}.
Plus some conversions from CRLF to LF line endings in .cc and .h files.
Bug: chromium:1098010
Change-Id: I8030e804eecd9f5a1ec9d66ae166efd8418c2a67
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/breakpad/breakpad/+/3878302
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@chromium.org>
It is often helpful to check if a particular symbol file dumped by
dump_syms actually matches a version of a binary file we have. The
symbol output contains an ID which can be used to see if it matches
the binary file. Unfortunately, this ID is internally calculated
and not a standard hash of the binary file. Being able to output the
header information only will allow users to determine whether their
symbol file is up to date or not.
R=jochen@chromium.org
BUG=561447
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1864823002 .
Patch from David Yen <dyen@chromium.org>.
This patch adds synth_elf::{StringTable,SymbolTable,ELF} classes to
produce in-memory ELF files to properly test the Linux symbol dumping
code. It also uses those classes to add some basic tests for
the WriteSymbolFile function.
R=jimb at http://breakpad.appspot.com/277001/show
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@794 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
This patch avoids unnecessary use of the <cfoo> headers in files that don't
actually use the identifiers they declare in the std:: namespace.
It also changes some files to better conform with the "Names and Order of
Includes" rules in the Google C++ Style Guide.
A=jimb R=mark
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@619 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
Yes, classes are useful. But that doesn't mean that every function has
to gratuitously become a member function. The Google C++ Style Guide
does not require this silliness, since the function is in the
google_breakpad namespace anyway.
a=jimblandy, r=nealsid
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@519 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
This also includes some comments I promised Cary Coutant I'd write
about the appropriateness of processing attributes in EndAttributes
calls.
The Google C++ Style Guide requires each file to have an author notice
and a comment explaining the file's general purpose. For the record, I
don't think putting an author notice on the files is a good idea; it's
odd to have the original author retain prominence even if the file has
been heavily edited by others; the version control system answers this
question more accurately. This is only for Style Guide compliance. The
Apache group decided to discourage author annotations, partially for
these reasons:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-jmeter-dev/200402.mbox/%3C4039F65E.7020406@atg.com%3E
a=jimblandy, r=nealsid
git-svn-id: http://google-breakpad.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@518 4c0a9323-5329-0410-9bdc-e9ce6186880e
